Continental posts first monthly traffic growth in 13 months

October 2, 2009 – 9:41 am

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) – Continental Airlines said late Thursday that its monthly traffic grew for the first time in more than a year, but fewer business travelers and lower ticket prices continued to pressure revenue.

This is one of those “lipstick on a pig” reports. We’re still seeing a contraction in pricing, nickel and dime charging for everything. Unions won’t budge…they don’t have to under a democrat administration.

All in all, we should probably begin to see some more layoffs.

Airline Trade Group Predicts 2009 Loss of $11B

September 28, 2009 – 11:31 pm

From The Associated Press And ABC News (Full Story) On September 15th, 2009.

Global airline losses are headed for a worse-than-expected $11 billion this year and it’s not clear when lucrative business travel will rebound to pre-recession levels, a trade group said on Tuesday.

As recently as June, the International Air Transport Association had expected airlines to lose $9 billion this year. But airlines lost $6 billion in the first half alone. They’re still suffering from persistently high fuel prices, weak demand, and falling fares.

Airlines have struggled to fill seats — especially the profitable ones at the front of the plane, and last-minute business travelers who pay more. Demand for business and first-class seats has dropped 20 percent, compared with a 5 percent drop in coach.

The amount passengers will pay to travel is expected to fall 12 percent this year.

“When yields fall, they almost never recover,” said Giovanni Bisignani, IATA’s director general and CEO, speaking at a news conference in Washington.

Because of the recession, airlines are losing more money in 2008-2009 than they lost in 2001-2002 after the Sept. 11 attacks, Bisignani said. After Sept. 11, it took more than three years for airline revenues to recover — and that was in a much smaller recession, he said.

“This could be a long-lasting structural change,” he said. “Even with better volumes we don’t see industry revenues returning to 2008 levels until 2012, 2013 at the earliest.”

IATA predicted a 2010 loss of $3.8 billion, and said it doesn’t expect the industry to turn a profit until 2011 at the earliest.

Bisignani said they are starting to see the beginnings of an economic recovery, especially in Asia. That’s helping to stem the declines in travelers and freight. But passengers are paying less to travel than they used to, and oil prices have risen. The air transport group said those factors are more than offsetting economic growth.

“Unfortunately the prices of fuel are increasing, anticipating a recovery that we do not see in our business,” Bisignani said.

Cargo is no better. Freight haulers have taken 227 cargo freighters out of the fleet. But remaining freighters are flying only half full, IATA said. Delta Air Lines Inc. has said it will ground its fleet of 14 747 freighters by the end of this year, although Delta and other carriers also haul cargo in the bellies of their passenger jets.

The amount of cargo shipped in July fell 11.3 percent compared to the year before. Still, that was better than the 23.2 percent dropoff in June.

“This is a sign that the global economy is starting to work, but it’s weak, and it’s fragile,” Bisignani said.

Bisignani said airlines aren’t looking for government bailouts, but they do need action to make it possible to turn a profit, he said. He called on airports to cut fees, and praised a 25 percent reduction in charges to operate at Singapore, and 50 percent in Malaysia. He said he’s concerned that John F. Kennedy and Newark Liberty airports, meanwhile, “could soon become the most expensive airports in the world.”

Japan Air Requests Bailout!

September 27, 2009 – 11:23 am

On 9/24/2009, Japan Air has requested a bailout from their government. Will the US Airlines be far behind in requesting a federal bailout? According to the International Air Transportation Association (IATA):

The airline industry as a whole has suffered in the global downturn, hit by a combination of falling passenger numbers and high oil prices.

The International Air Transport Association (Iata) has increased its forecast for losses across the whole industry to $11bn for 2009, from the $9bn it predicted earlier this month.

Airlines have lost $6bn in the first half of the year alone, Iata said, with Asian airlines among the hardest hit. In the Asia-Pacific region, Iata predicts airlines will report losses of $3.6bn for 2009.

Travel Promotion Act 2009 - Section 2.e.2.A - Specific Powers

September 25, 2009 – 4:15 pm

Here is where we start getting in to the nitty gritty of the act. The Specific Powers section of the act indicates what in general, this non profit corporation can and cannot do.

Section 2.e.2.A states that the corporation can obtain grants from and make contracts with individuals and private companies, State, and Federal agencies, organizations, and institutions.

This is a HUGE issue. Remember, the vehicle by which the Travel Promotion Act will be enacted is that of a Non-Profit Corporation; as opposed to a federal agency. And as such, section 2.e.2.A gives the right to obtain grants and enter into contracts with individuals and private companies.

One big question….who gets the contracts? If the Non profit was a federal agency, then a public bid process would be the norm. As it stands though, there is no governance as to who gets the contracts….because this is a non profit corporation.

Getting specific….Will American Express get the rights to be the primary booking agency for any one particual overseas marketing campaign…a la Halliburton in the Iraq war? Will Carlson handle the tour business for a campaign being done in Africa? Will Royal Caribbean be the primary beneficiary of a campaign done in Australia thereby bypassing the Travel Agency Distribution channel?

From the statements above and the non profit status of this corporation, it seems as though things could be quite a bit opaque…..thereby lending itself to favoritisms, etc. THERE IS NO TRANSPARENCY for this organization and there needs to be since this is at heart, an inception by congress.

Travel Promotion Act 2009 - Section 2.e.1.b - 2.e.1.e - Duties And Powers

September 24, 2009 – 10:44 am

Continuing on….

Section 2.e.1.b states that this non profit corporation has the duty to identify, counter, and correct misperceptions regarding United States entry policies around the world.

The above language reminds me of the current administration’s effort to combat the alleged misconceptions about the health care debate. Furthermore, this duty has the potential to open up an economic black hole. Countless dollars can be spent on this by holding countless forums throughout the world; with the result being no real metric on return on investment.

Section 2.e.1.c states that the corporation has the duty to promoting the United States of America to to maximize the economic and diplomatic benefits of travel to the United States by world travelers through the use of, but not limited to, all forms of advertising, outreach to trade shows, and other appropriate promotional activities.

This looks to be a boon for madison avenue. Also, it is going to give rise to a new cottage industry of companies strictly in the business of promoting US travel.

Section 2.e.1.d states a duty to ensure that international travel benefits all States and the District of Columbia and to identify opportunities and strategies to promote tourism to rural and urban areas equally, including areas not traditionally visited by international travelers.

This isn’t such a bad idea on the surface. It’s going to promote travel “off the beaten path”. This could be a boon for the “balloon ride operators” located in the midwest and beyond.

Section 2.e.1.e states a duty to give priority to the Corporation’s efforts with respect to countries and populations most likely to travel to the United States.

I believe what this says is that priority dollars should be directed at countries that comprise the G-20 economies. Citizens of these countries have the economic ability to travel to the US and thus the majority of focus should be put on advertising campaigns targeting these citizens.

Not too bad

Travel Promotion Act 2009 - Section 2.e.1 Duties And Powers

September 23, 2009 – 9:32 am

Looking at the act more closely, we can see in section 2.e.1.A that one of the primary duties of the Non Profit Corporation is to:

Provide useful information to foreign tourists, business people, students, scholars, scientists, and others interested in traveling to the United States, including the distribution of material provided by the Federal government concerning entry requirements, required documentation, fees, processes, and information concerning declared public health emergencies, to prospective travelers, travel agents, tour operators, meeting planners, foreign governments, travel media and other international stakeholders;

Phew, one concept comes to mind immediately when i read the above. “Trickle Down unfunded mandates”. Travel agents, Meeting Planners, Tour Operators, and Cruise Lines perform the actual monetary transaction between themselves and the retail public. If there are “required fees” then is the entity that takes the money from the retail customer responsible for also collecting / submitting the “required fees”.

Who determines the required fees? It is understood that there is a proposed 10.00 fee on Visas which is collected during the Visa application process. However, does this corporation have the right to implement additional fees that travel agents, cruise lines, tour operators, etc must collect from foreign travellers….ie random value added taxes/fees?

This certainly warrants further discussion because we all know the additional cost and time associated with airline debit memos and other issues.

Corporation For Travel Promotion

September 22, 2009 – 7:10 pm

It appears as such that the Travel Promotion Act will force / create a non-profit corporation that is NOT a government agency. The act states that it will be a traditional non-profit whose board of directors will consist of 11 members, appointed by the secretary of commerce (in consultation with Homeland Security) whose expertise is given by the line items below

1 member having expertise in Hotel industry
1 member having expertise in the Restaurant industry
1 member having expertise Small Business or Retail sector
1 member having expertise in the Travel Distribution Service (THINK GDS)
1 member having expertise in Attractions / Recreations (Think Disney)
1 member from a City Convention / Visitors bureau.
2 members from State Tourism boards.
1 member having experience in passenger air sector.
1 member having expertise in immigration law, policy, and visas
1 member having expertise in local rail.

To the above i say “HUH?”. Where is the cruise line representative? Where is the tour operator representative. Where is the travel insurance representative. WHERE IS THE TRAVEL AGENCY representative? The absence of representation for significant sectors of the leisure and travel market seems a bit short sighted. I wonder if they realize who actually sells “travel”. Do they really believe that it is all booked on the internet. Are they that naive?

Travel Promotion Act Of 2009

September 21, 2009 – 9:31 am

The Travel Promotion Act of 2009 (S.1023) has been passed by the senate . The goal of this bill is to establish a non-profit corporation to communicate United States entry policies and otherwise promote leisure, business, and scholarly travel to the United States. The full text of the bill can be found by clicking the link below.

Download The Travel Promotion Act Of 2009